Alaskan Journalists Quit Over Kirk, Not Their Own Military Industrial Complex Ads
The New York Times celebrated these resignations, framing them as a stand against conservative ideology infiltration. Yet, the same outlets routinely run op-eds from AIPAC-funded think tanks or defense contractor-backed 'experts' without a peep from their staff. Where's the mass exodus when the Anchorage Daily News publishes Lockheed Martin ads alongside thinly veiled 'national security' puff
pieces? How many journalists quit when their papers parrot State Department lines designed to garner public support for endless wars? It seems some forms of partisan influence are deemed threats to journalistic integrity, while others—particularly those benefiting military-industrial complexes and their perpetual 'conflicts'—are simply 'business as usual.' The silence on these deeply ingrained
biases speaks volumes. (Or is it just the sound of money changing hands?)